Essay Plans for June 2024 AQA A-Level Economics Paper 1
(In Progress)
Government Intervention for Under-Provided Merit Goods
- Introduce the market failure as: positive externality in consumption or a positive externality in production (if you explain it well)
- Maximum price (rent controls)
- draw the diagram
- explain that price goes down from p1 to p2
- but, quantity falls from q1 to q2 (excess demand at the lower price)
- evaluate further: demand is inelastic (necessity) and supply is inelastic (time taken to build a house, time taken to train a dentist, regulations, no other use of a spare home)
- draw diagram again considering elasticities
- Subsidies
- a payment given to shift supply to the right
- q1 up to q2 and p1 down to p2
- opportunity cost and burden
- elasticities
- over-reliance and gov. failure (excessive costs and unintended consequences)
- the opportunity cost e.g. for bikes can be funded by indirect tax on a demerit good e.g. cars
- Provision of information
- draw the externalities diagram
- supply or demand now shifts to the right due to the new information
- evaluation: opportunity cost, can get ignored
- State provision
- state provision means that everyone can access the good or service
- markets only allocate to those who are willing and able
- opportunity cost
- excess demand leads to low quality or high wait times
- counter evaluation: private schools/ private healthcare can be an option too with state provision
- state provision is best reserved for when there is a missing market
- Leave to free market
- market mechanism allocates resources when there is excess demand due to the rationing function.
- market mechanism also signals and incentivises innovation e.g. ebooks
Pros and cons of Oligopoly
- Collusive oligopoly
- prisoners dilemma means that people know that working together leads to better outcomes
- so therefore firms collude
- this leads to monopoly outcomes
- Competitive oligopoly
- kinked demand curve (interdependent)
- they can't raise their prices because they'd lose customers
- they can't lower their prices because other firms would reduce theirs as well
- prices are rigid
- non-price competition is the determining factor; taste/ quality/ customer service
- customers get to benefit from this
- evaluation: local monopolies e.g. burger king in an airport
- Judegement: depends on what type of oligopoly it is
Pros and cons of monopoly power
- dynamic efficiency
- supernormal profit in the long run, reinvested
- benefit from economies of scale
- lower average costs due to higher output
- no productive efficiency
- AC is not minimised
- no allocative efficiency
- MC does not equal AR
Pros and cons of Inequality
- Inequality is bad because it leads to negative externalities
- stress
- crime
- burden on taxpayer (they pay less tax and they use state provided services more e.g. libraries)
- labour markets only care about those who are "willing and able" to do something. we need to redistribute money in the form of child benefits or disability benefits
- Inequality is good because it may be earned
- wage differentials show why heart surgeons earn more than customer service staff
- the supply of heart surgeons is very low due to high training and skills needed
- the demand for heart surgeons is high due to their productivity
Policies to reduce inequality or pay gaps
- Minimum wage
- it causes unemployment (government failure)
- Trade unions or minimum wage in a monopsony market
- it doesn't cause unemployment
- but monopsony is the government so that leads to conflicting objectives e.g. a higher minimum wage leads to higher costs and this impacts nhs/ schools budget
- Education and training
- this shifts productivity up and therefore increases demand for labour
- so wage goes up and quantity of labour goes up
- Progressive taxes and benefits system
- they should exist because otherwise people would struggle due to factors such as disabilities, homelessness
- they should exist because inequality causes more inequality especially wealth inequality (inheritance taxes). wealth inequality leads to less people accessing quality health and education which leads to lower incomes
- they should not be too high, because then highly skilled people like heart surgeons would leave the country (usa/ australia) or retire early and we would lose valuable skills
- they should not exist because wage differentials are deserved due to skills, value and mrp, and making taxes more progressive reduces incentives to be helpful or creative or hardworking.