Paper 3 Recap Delete after
- Demand
- PIRATES
- related goods
- substitutes and complements
- PED
- SANDPIT
- XED
- substitutes and complements
- YED
- luxury or inferior or normal
- Supply
- PCTWINS
- indirect tax and subsidies
- PES
- Demand for labour
- demand for the good, price of capital, productivity
- PEDlabour
- inelastic product, capital substitute?, cost of labour as a proportion of total costs
- Supply of labour
- wages in substitute jobs, barriers to entry, population, value of leisure
- PESlabour
- vocational element, length of training period, skills
- AD
- C I G X-M
- disposable incomes, consumer confidence, interest rates, business confidence, state of the economy, exchange rates
- SRAS
- cost of production
- raw material prices, wages, exchange rates
- LRAS
- supply side policies, incentives, technology, education and training
- Y1 TO Y2. PL1 TO PL2
- ALWAYS RELATE TO THE FOUR MACROECONOMIC OBJECTIVES
Is it recommended to have a weak currency? Yes or No
- YES
- exports become more competitive
- this would improve balance of trade
- AD shifts right because AD = C + I + G + (X-M)
- Evaluation: inflation
- NO
- imports become more expensive
- this is bad for two reasons
- SRAS will shift to the left
- LINK TO 4 OBJECTIVES
- Y1 TO Y2
- PL1 TO PL2
- we import raw materials
- raw materials become more expensive
- however raw materials are inelastic
- therefore we spend more on the same amount of imports
- so our costs of production rise
- our standards of living as we cannot afford some nice imports
- incentive to produce ourselves
Is it recommended to have a very strong currency? Yes or No
Recommended policy to fix a current account deficit
- lower interest rates
- lower exchange rates
- tariff EXPENDITURE REDUCING
- imports go down
- diagram
- exports go down because of retaliation
- supply side policies
- LRAS shifts right
- y1 to y2
- PL1 to PL2
- 4 objectives
- cost and time lag
- £100 billion HS2
- 15 years +
- contractionary monetary policy EXPENDITURE REDUCING
- raise interest rates
- cost of borrowing increases
- AD shifts to the left
- deflation happens
- UK prices fall
- exports more competitive
- and imports more expensive
- HOWEVER: exchange rates would go up if interest rates would go up and surely this would worsen the balance of payments.
- contractionary fiscal policy EXPENDITURE REDUCING
- reduce spending
- AD shifts to the left
- deflation happens
- UK prices fall
- exports more competitive
- and imports more expensive
- HOWEVER: it impacts the other 3 macro objectives
- LRAS shifting left e.g. if u cut spending on health/ education/ infrastructure or if u raise taxes, it reduces incentives
Is a current account deficit important to fix or should it left?
- Yes
- X is low and M is high so AD is low
- AD left diagram
- Unemployment y1 to y2
- Deflation
- Yes
- sign of over-dependence
- vulnerable to currency shocks
- SRAS shift left
- No
- AD = C + I+ G + (X-M)
- u might still have really high incomes, really high output, high economic growth, high investment
- boom
- No
- Self-regulating
- If imports are higher than exports
- Then value of the pound would fall
- so exports would automatically rise.
Development
- Economic development is most commonly measured by the HDI
- living standards: through real GDP per capita
- health: life expectancy at birth
- education: average years of schooling
- Economic growth is essential for economic development but NOT ENOUGH ON ITS OWN
- Market supply side policies
- reduce income tax/ corporation tax/ privatisation/ get rid of minimum wage
- lower costs of production
- attracts FDI
- this is when an MNC brings technology into a country to establish a long lasting relationship in that country
- thus providing transfer of skills and technology and creating jobs
- MORE INCOMES. MORE SPENDING ON HEALTH AND EDUCATION
- HARROD DOMAR MODEL: HIGH CAPITAL STOCK LEADS TO HIGH GROWTH LEADS TO HIGH INCOMES LEADS TO HIGH SAVINGS LEADS TO HIGH INVESTMENT LEADS TO HIGH CAPITAL STOCK
- HOWEVER: exploitation of workers means low wages and poor working conditions. WORSEN HEALTH
- reduce income tax/ corporation tax/ privatisation/ get rid of minimum wage
- Interventionist supply side policies
- spending money on health or education or infrastructure or higher minimum wage
- DEVELOPMENT TRAP means: poor health means poor incomes means poor growth means poor development means poor health
- HOWEVER: HIGH OPPORTUNITY COST, NATIONAL DEBT. country can ask for FOREIGN AID
- tariffs
- developing countries always end up having a comparative advantage in PRIMARY COMMODITIES.
- THIS IS BAD BECAUSE
- primary sector prices are too volatile e.g. weather
- primary sector is INCOME INELASTIC
- it is better for them if they had comparative advantage in manufacturing sector
- it is cheaper to import manufactured goods
- there is no business for people selling them in the country
- More demand for local businesses
- more jobs created
- more incomes
- more tax revenue
- MORE SPENDING ON HEALTH AND EDUCATION
- spending money on health or education or infrastructure or higher minimum wage
Should the government intervene to fix inequality or leave it
- LEAVE IT
- government failure
- progressive taxes: Laffer curve
- minimum wage: excess demand (unemployment)
- inequality is arguably fair because it is dependent on MRP. more inequality also creates incentives
- government failure
- FIX IT
- negative externalities: crime/ anxiety
- this burdens the taxpayer
- unemployment benefits
- Macro point: low consumer confidence
What is the best way to reduce inequality
- progressive tax and benefits system
- education and training increases demand for labour