paper 3 recap delete after
10 marker
3 paragraphs
- DESCRIBE THE DATA
- EXPLAIN HOW THE DATA LINKS TO THE QUESTION
- 1 easy limitation
- CONCLUSION
- YES or NO
15 marker
- DIAGRAM
25 marker
- BALANCE OF PAYMENTS/ EXCHANGE RATES
- is it recommended to have a weak currency
- YES
- exports more attractive
- AD shift right
- 4 objectives
- INFLATION
- NO
- SRAS SHIFTS LEFT
- COST OF PRODUCTIONS RISE A LOT
- COST PUSH INFLATION
- THIS HAPPENED START OF 2024
- Firms are dependent on raw materials such as oil
- Passed costs on to consumers
- MARSHALL LERNER CONDITIION
- 4 OBJECTIVES
- YES
- is it recommended to fix a c. a deficit or leave it
- LEAVE IT
- AD = C, I, G, X-M
- BOOM
- living standards are higher
- inflation is high
- buy imports
- OTHER 3 OBJECTIVES
- it fixes itself
- if exports are low and imports are high
- currency devalues due to low demand
- and then naturally exports become more competitive
- FIX IT
- AD fall
- macro objectives
- PEOPLE LOSING JOBS
- STRUCTURAL UNEMPLOYMENT
- free trade
- LEAVE IT
- is it recommended to have a weak currency
- what is best policy to fix a c. a deficit
- contractionary fiscal policy EXPENDITURE REDUCING
- lower G or higher taxes
- AD shifts left
- Deflation
- lower prices in the UK
- messes up other objectives
- lower interest rates
- lower exchange rates
- SRAS LEFT
- lower exchange rates
- SUPPLY SIDE POLICIES
- TARIFFS
- economies of scale
- contractionary fiscal policy EXPENDITURE REDUCING
- DEVELOPMENT
- development is most commonly measured by HDI
- real GDP per capita
- life expectancy at birth
- average years of schooling
- MARKET BASED POLICIES
- lower taxes/ removing minimum wages
- reduces cost of production
- ATTRACTS FDI
- when an MNC brings technology into a country and engages in a long lasting relationship/ project in that economy
- increase capital stock
- more growth
- more jobs
- more income
- more savings
- more investment
- more capital stock
- HARROD DOMAR MODEL
- MNCs may exploit workers
- through low pay
- poor working conditions
- contribute low taxes
- BAD HEALTH AND EDUCATION
- INTERVENTIONIST BASED POLICIES
- SPENDING ON HEALTH AND EDUCATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE
- DEVELOPMENT TRAP: low incomes low health
- national debt as % of GDP
- government failure
- excessive cost
- inadequate information
- ASK FOR AID
- development is most commonly measured by HDI
- TARIFFS
- diagram
- they have comparative advantage in commodities
- this is useless as they are price volatile (weather) and income inelastic
- they should try to get into the MANUFACTURING SECTOR
- TRAINERS/ CHAIRS
- increases domestic demand and creates jobs
- RETALIATION
- INEQUALITY
- is it worth intervening or not
- YES
- macro point: poor living standards and confidence and uncertainty
- inequality is bad for everyone
- gov, rich people, poor people
- negative externalities e.g. crime, low tax contribution
- NO
- inequality through wage differentials
- may be earned
- MRP
- creates incentives
- YES
- best policies to reduce inequality
- progressive tax and benefit system
- higher minimum wages
- education and training
- is it worth intervening or not